One futures prop firm publishes its pass rates today. We commit to going further — every quarter, with the raw anonymised CSV attached, so anyone can recompute our numbers instead of trusting our summary of them.
First report: one full quarter after launch. Then every quarter, on a published date, whatever the numbers say.
Every metric below exists somewhere in this industry already. What almost never gets published is the version of it that can hurt the firm printing it.
Both per attempt AND per person, side by side.
These two numbers can differ by a factor of three. Publishing only the flattering one is the oldest trick in this market — a firm with a 17% per-attempt rate can show 52% per person simply because people retry.
Share of funded accounts that received at least one payout.
Getting funded is not the product. Getting paid is. A firm can fund generously and pay rarely, and no published pass rate would reveal it.
Median, 25th and 75th percentile — not an average.
An average payout is trivially inflated by one outlier. The median tells you what a typical paid trader actually received.
Share of funded accounts still alive at 30, 60, 90, 180 days.
Nobody in this industry publishes this. It is the single number that tells you whether funded accounts are a product or a turnstile.
From request to money received, median and 90th percentile.
Every firm advertises a maximum. Almost none publish what actually happens, and the tail is where the complaints live.
A number is only worth what its method is worth. Ours is fixed before the first report, so it cannot be tuned once we see what the data says.
Publishing a bad number will hurt. That is exactly what makes the commitment credible — and impossible to copy for a firm whose numbers cannot stand the light. If we ever miss a quarter, treat the silence as the number.
No report exists yet. The first one is due one quarter after launch — this page is the commitment, published before there is anything to hide.