Marking the close (banging the close)
Marking the close, also called banging the close, is trading or order placement around the closing or settlement period intended to influence the price at which the market closes or settles. On US futures markets, the Commodity Exchange Act prohibits conduct that demonstrates intentional or reckless disregard for the orderly execution of transactions during the closing period.
Senzoukria · Glossary · Updated September 2026
The rule in US futures
Among the disruptive practices listed in section 4c(a)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act is any trading, practice or conduct that demonstrates intentional or reckless disregard for the orderly execution of transactions during the closing period. The CFTC's guidance adds three points. Conduct outside the closing period can also violate the provision, for example accumulating a large position just before the closing period with the intent, or reckless disregard, to disrupt it. Bids and offers count, not only executed trades. And accidental or even negligent conduct is not enough: the provision requires intent or recklessness.
Why the close matters
The settlement price of a futures contract is used to mark positions to market every day, so it drives margin flows between accounts. Options, structured products and fund benchmarks can also reference closing or settlement values. That concentration of consequences in a short window is what makes the close attractive to influence and why the law singles it out.
Reading closing-window activity
- Volume often rises into a settlement window for ordinary reasons: positions squared before the end of the day, index rebalancing, hedges timed to the benchmark.
- Compare a closing bar with the same minute of previous sessions rather than with the rest of the day, which has a different rhythm.
- A burst of aggressive prints in the final minutes, followed by a reversal in the next session, is a pattern to note, not evidence of intent.
- The official settlement price is published by the exchange and follows its own procedure; a chart's last traded price can differ from it.
A worked example
A one-minute bar in the closing window prints 4,000 contracts. Over the five previous sessions, the same minute averaged 1,000. A time-of-day comparison puts the bar at 4.0 times its usual activity for that minute. That is a measurement worth recording, together with delta and price change, but it establishes nothing about why the volume arrived.
In Senzoukria
The Time-of-Day Volume indicator divides each bar's volume by the average volume printed during the same session minute over the previous sessions, five by default, with sessions anchored on the CME open at 17:00 Chicago time; it is the reading used in the example above. The Prior Session H/L/C overlay projects the previous session's high, low and close onto the next session; its close is the close of the last bar of that session as loaded on the chart, not the exchange's official settlement price.
Related
In the same section
- Martingale
- Marketable limit order
- Matching engine
- Market-if-touched order
- Max pain
- Market replay
- MAE
- Market regime
Sources
- CFTC: Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement on Disruptive Practices (fact sheet) (2026-09-25)
- 7 U.S. Code § 6c, Prohibited transactions (Legal Information Institute) (2026-09-25)
This page in other languages
Frequently asked questions
- Is heavy volume at the close a sign of manipulation?
- Not by itself. Closing and settlement windows attract volume for many legitimate reasons. The prohibition concerns conduct that shows intentional or reckless disregard for orderly execution during that period, which regulators assess with evidence far beyond a volume bar.
- Is the close on my chart the settlement price?
- Usually not exactly. The exchange computes the official settlement price with its own procedure for each product. A chart's close is the last trade of the last bar in the session as the data source delivered it, which is why platforms and settlement reports can show different values.